Comparison of European Surnames Y-Chromosome Markers with those of an Indian Surname

L. David Roper (roperld@vt.edu)
(www.roperld.com)

Contents

I have compared the 25 Y-chromosome markers for 60 families, in which I identified a paleolithic group of families and a smaller neolithic group of families. I extended that analysis to define four different neolithic groups. Here I expand the comparison by including six sets of Y-chromosome 12-markers for the Asian Indian surname Chitpavan. (I am grateful to Jagannath Dixit, M.D. for providing these data to me.)

A way to look at the results is through a phylogenetic network. I use the free software of Fluxus Engineering (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/sharenet.htm) to calculate and draw a network. (There are usually several possible networks for any given set of markers, but I present only the simplest looking one calculated by the program.) The phylogenetic network diagram is a visual way to see the genetic distances or relative mutations among the participants.

The data are:

Name/Allele
(prefix DYS)
393 390 19 391 385a 385b 426 388 439 389-1 392 (389-2)-
(389-11)
Dixit 14 23 14 10 13 19 12 12 12 14 10 17
Abhyankar 14 23 14 10 14 20 12 12 10 13 10 16
Phadke 11 22 14 10 14 16 11 12 13 12 13 16
Kanhere 11 22 14 11 13 16 11 12 12 12 14 16
Joshi 12 24 14 10 18 18 11 14 12 14 11 16
Damle 12 24 14 10 18 19 11 14 13 14 11 16
Ranade 11 21 14 11 14 16 11 12 13 13 14 16
Manohar 12 23 14 10 14 19 11 15 11 13 11 18
Joshee 12 24 14 10 18 19 11 14 12 14 11 16
Khare 13 22 15 11 13 14 11 12 12 12 11 19
Lele 13 25 15 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 10 18

One should subtract 389-1 from 389-2 before calculating relative mutations or calculating phylogenetic networks. If one does not do this one can get either one too many or one too few relative mutations.

The relative mutations among these individuals are:

Relative
Mutations
Dixit Abhyankar Phadke Kanhere Joshi Damle Ranade Manohar Joshee Khare
Dixit 0
Abhyankar 6 0
Phadke 16 16 0
Kanhere 16 18 4 0
Joshi 14 16 16 18 0
Damle 14 16 16 20 2 0
Ranade 18 18 4 4 18 18 0
Manohar 11 11 15 17 11 11 17 0
Joshee 13 15 17 19 1 1 19 10 0
Khare 15 19 13 11 21 23 15 16 22 0
Lele 15 17 21 19 23 25 21 18 24 10

Return to top of page.

Another way to look at the results is through a phylogenetic network. I use the free software of Fluxus Engineering (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/sharenet.htm) to calculate and draw a network. (The official brief instructions for using the program are at http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/netwinfaq.htm. I have some further instructions at Brief Instructions for Using the Phylogenetic Network Program)(There are usually several possible networks for any given set of markers, but I present only the simplest looking one calculated by the program.) The phylogenetic network diagram is a visual way to see the genetic distances or relative mutations among the participants.

A phylogenetic network for these individuals is:

Note that there are four groups of hitpavans.

Another way to visualize the relationships among the testees is by time-ordered (rooted tree) phylograms calculated from relative-mutations matrices. To create time-ordered phylograms, I use the PHYLIP Neighbor software, with the UPGMA option (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean), and the relative-mutations matrix to generate a tree file (*.tre) to be plotted by the TreeView software. (For a description of how I do it, see PHYLIPTreeViewUse.htm.) Here is a phylogram for the Chitpavans:

Note the scale in the lower left corner: The distance shown is 0.1 relative mutations. For long times for 12 markers, 1 relative mutation is about 1000 years, assuming a generation is 25 years and the average mutation rate is 1/500 per marker [(500 gen/mutation)·(25 years/gen)/(12 markers)~=1000 years]. The extreme right is the present time. Do not use this calculation for short times, because a single mutation can occur in 1 generation or 25 years.

Return to top of page.

To compare the six Chitpavans to the European groups (See Neolithic Groups of Humans and Defining an Ancient European Ancestor), look at the relative mutations:

Relative
mutations
Paleolithic
Median
Neolithic
Group 1
Neolithic
Group 2
Neolithic
Group 3
Neolithic
Group 4
Neolithic
Group 5
Neolithic
Group 6
Neolithic
Group 7
Dixit 15 16 13 9 16 14 16 13
Abhyankar 17 14 15 11 18 14 18 15
Phadke 13 10 15 17 18 12 14 13
Kanhere 11 12 17 19 18 14 18 13
Joshi 19 14 15 9 22 18 16 11
Damle 21 16 17 9 24 20 16 13
Ranade 13 14 17 19 20 16 16 15
Manohar 20 11 12 10 19 11 13 10
Joshee 20 15 16 8 23 19 17 12
Khare 12 9 14 16 13 7 9 12
Lele 8 15 16 18 5 13 13 14

;This phylogenetic network compares the six Chitpavans to the paleolithic group and neolithic groups:

Note that some of the Asian Indian families are more closely related to a European group than they are to the other Asian Indian families.

Note that, although Lele has fewer relative mutations with the paleolithic group, the phylogenetic network shows it closer to neolithic Group 4.

Here are the relative mutations for the unique testees with four standard haplogroups:

Haplogroups
(prefix DYS)
388 393 392 19(394) 390 391 Relative
mutations
with hg 1, 1.15+
Relative
mutations
with hg 2, 2,47+
Relative
mutations
with hg 3, 3.65+
Relative
mutations
with Cohen hg
hg 1, 1.15 12 13 13 14 24 11 0 7 5 9
hg 2, 2.47 14 13 11 14 22 10 7 0 8 4
hg 3, 3.65 12 13 11 16 25 11 5 8 0 10
Cohen hg 16 12 11 14 23 10 9 4 10 0
Dixit 12 14 10 14 23 10 6 5 7 7
Abhyankar 12 14 10 14 23 10 6 5 7 7
Phadke 12 11 13 14 22 10 5 6 10 8
Kanhere 12 11 14 14 22 11 5 8 10 10
Joshi 14 12 11 14 24 10 6 3 7 3
Damle 14 12 11 14 24 10 6 3 7 3
Ranade 12 11 14 14 21 11 6 9 11 11
Manohar 15 12 11 14 23 10 8 3 9 1
Joshee 14 12 11 14 24 10 6 3 7 3
Khare 12 13 11 15 22 11 5 4 4 8
Lele 12 13 10 15 25 11 5 8 2 10

Return to top of page.

This phylogenetic network compares the unique Chitpavan testees to the four haplogroups:

Joshi & Manoha are in the Cohen group. Lele is in the hg3 group.

We see that the testees are in neither of these four haplogroups.

For a information about haplogroups see: ;http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~dgarvey/DNA/RelGen/YCC.html; http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/98/9/5078.pdf; http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~dgarvey/DNA/RelGen/6markers.html

Return to top of page.
www.roperld.com