# Greenland Ice Loss

L. David Roper
http://arts.bev.net/RoperLDavid/
23 August, 2010

## Introduction

Greenland-ice-mass-loss data are conveniently display in graphs. The data are ice-mass balance: accumulation minus ablation (includes melting) minus iceberg calving. I started with 2.59x106 gigatonnes of ice in 2009 and worked backward in time subtracting off the values taken from Figure 2 to get an approximate value for the Greenland ice mass for each data point.

In this work I fitted hyperbolic-tangent functions to the Greenland-ice-mass-loss data and projected the fits into the future.

Units: 1 gigatonne = 1.1 km3 of ice. Ice mass of Greenland = 2.59x106 gigatonnes = 2.85x106 km3.

## Fit to the Greenland Ice Loss

The equation for the fit involving three hyperbolic tangents is .

One of the fits is shown in the following graph: The ice-mass unit is 106 gigatonnes. All fits shown below fit the data about equally well. This shows three of the fits. The red curve is a slightly better fit than the other five fits. This shows three more fits, including one for which all Greenland ice melts at about year 2040.

## Fit Using Atmospheric-Carbon-Dioxide Concentration

In another study I have projected atmospheric-carbon-dioxide concentration (CD) into the future; one a least-case (LC) projection and another a worst-case (WC) projection. For LC the CD peaks at about 470 ppmv at about year 2115; for WC the CD peaks at about 1110 ppmv at about year 2135. The peaks are due to the fact that fossil-fuels extraction have extraction peaks due to depletion of the resources.

Here are graphs of the two cases:  Here I report on fits of the Arctic-sea-ice area to the two CD cases using two different hyperbolic-tangent functions

• Add: ,
• Product: .

where CD = atmospheric-carbon-dioxide concentration. That is, the rise is parametrized as an unknown cause, but the fall is parametrized as due to CD.

The reason for using the hyperbolic tanget is because the ice are must asymptotically approach some value greater than or equal to zero.

The four fits are shown in the following graphs: The jiggles are noise in the Excel calculations. All CD fits eventually rise after going toward or near zero, because the fossil-fuels extraction (and, thus, use) falls to zero after peaking. The least-case one rises faster because its carbon-dioxide concentration is lower.

## Conclusion

The recent rapid drop in Greenland ice mass must be measured for many more years before one can use the hyperbolic tangent to project a future asymptote..

Back to the top